Liam Lawson expresses strong disappointment over new F1 rule proposal

Liam Lawson voices disappointment at a proposed FIA rule mandating driver cooling vests from 2026.

The push follows heat-related concerns highlighted by the 2023 Qatar Grand Prix.

Vests are currently authorised when a heat hazard is declared, debuting in Singapore 2025 and used again at the United States Grand Prix.

Drivers broadly accept the intent to improve welfare, yet many question making the system compulsory.

Lawson argues the vest lacks the life-saving justification that underpins devices like the Halo and HANS.

He believes enforced use adds discomfort without clear, universal benefit across conditions and driving styles.

Teams also view vests as added failure points inside already constrained cockpits, with potential performance distractions.

Austin’s Friday running reportedly featured an Antonelli vest malfunction, reinforcing apprehension about system robustness.

Several drivers prefer discretion, using conditioning and car cooling strategies to manage heat demands.

Regulatory options range from a full mandate to heat-hazard activation only, or tighter technical standards.

Any rule will force teams to balance packaging, mass, and airflow with driver comfort and reliability.

In the championship picture, McLaren leads the 2025 standings, with Lando Norris on 357 points and Oscar Piastri on 356.

Max Verstappen sits third on 321, while Racing Bulls hold sixth with 72 points.

Those venues may feature high temperatures, ensuring the debate remains prominent through season’s end.

The FIA now weighs driver feedback against consistency and welfare aims before finalising 2026 regulations.

Visual Summary

Daniel Miller

Daniel Miller reports on Formula 1 Grand Prix weekends with race-day analysis, team-radio highlights, and point-standings updates. He explains power-unit upgrades, aerodynamic developments, and driver rivalries in straightforward, SEO-friendly language for a global F1 audience.