Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Fernando Alonso Reveals Classic F1 Tactic to Boost Race Excitement

LISTEN

0:00 0:00
Table of contents

Highlights

  • Fernando Alonso proposes bringing back refuelling in F1 races
  • Refuelling last used in Formula 1 during 2009 season
  • F1 president Domenicali considers shorter races, reverse grids, sprints
  • Alonso warns shorter races might reduce overtaking opportunities
  • Refuelling could create more varied strategies and dynamic racing
  • F1 exploring new formats to appeal to younger fans

Fernando Alonso urges F1 president Stefano Domenicali to revisit in-race refuelling, arguing it could raise strategic complexity and on-track jeopardy as the series explores new formats.

The two-time champion cautions that shorter races risk suppressing overtaking chances and reducing recovery opportunities after poor qualifying results.

Alonso contends refuelling would diversify fuel-load choices, open alternative stint lengths, and vary pit timing, creating more passing windows and strategic jeopardy across a Grand Prix.

“Shorter races might cut overtaking chances,” Alonso warns, advocating refuelling to restore strategic variety.
Fernando Alonso proposes refuelling return in Formula 1
Image Credit: RaceFans

Refuelling first appeared in the early 1980s, was banned in 1984, returned in 1994, and remained until 2009. It shaped strategy and often decided outcomes during that era.

The ban reflected safety concerns and evolving sporting priorities. Any reintroduction would require strict procedural controls and consensus on cost, logistics, and competitive impact.

Domenicali continues to float shorter races, reverse grids, and expanded sprint formats to reach younger audiences, while safeguarding credibility and maintaining technical relevance.

Refuelling last featured in 2009; Alonso believes its return would increase strategic divergence and passing opportunities.

Alonso’s central point is strategic time. Longer race distances extend undercut windows, tyre-life offsets, and safety-car variance, giving drivers space to recover and teams scope to pivot plans.

Drivers speak at the Belgian Grand Prix press conference
Image Credit: AutoRacing1

The 2025 competitive picture underlines the stakes. McLaren’s Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris set the pace, while Max Verstappen remains a persistent threat amid shifts in form and execution.

Changes to format could re-shape advantage profiles. High-deg cars might benefit from flexible stint lengths; straight-line efficient packages could gain from lighter fuel phases.

F1 is weighing reverse grids and longer sprints, with drivers and teams split on spectacle versus complexity.

Debate also intersects with future planning. Discussions around regulations and sporting formats sit alongside the evolving Verstappen–Red Bull 2026 outlook, which influences how teams prioritise development.

Any trial must balance entertainment, safety, cost, and sporting integrity. Mixed paddock views persist on whether new formats enhance racing or introduce unintended distortions.

These choices mirror broader motorsport trade-offs, from sprint emphasis to oval-road course blends seen in F1 vs NASCAR comparisons, and wider auto racing industry trends.

Visual Summary

Alonso’s old-school
refuel idea!

STRATEGY = EXCITEMENT

1982
first seen
1994-2009
iconic era
2010+
banned
Will refuelling return for 2026?



More fuel strategies = more overtaking, more drama.

Long races let us fight back and create a show,”
– Fernando Alonso


Sprints
🔀
Reverse Grid

Refuelling?

Would YOU bring back refuelling for Formula 1 excitement?

Daniel miller author image
Daniel Miller

Daniel Miller reports on Formula 1 Grand Prix weekends with race-day analysis, team-radio highlights, and point-standings updates. He explains power-unit upgrades, aerodynamic developments, and driver rivalries in straightforward, SEO-friendly language for a global F1 audience.

Articles: 1613

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *