Custom Racing Suit
Get Started for FREE
Williams Reacts After Stewards’ Verdict on Carlos Sainz Review
LISTEN
0:00
0:00
Highlights
- Williams challenged Sainz’s Dutch GP penalty with new evidence
- Stewards reopened case using 360-degree and rear-facing footage
- Sainz admitted limited entitlement to outside racing space
- Penalty points removed; 10-second time penalty remained
- Race results unchanged; incident classified as a racing incident
Williams secures a partial reprieve in the Dutch Grand Prix review, with Carlos Sainz’s penalty points rescinded while his 10-second time penalty stands. The stewards confirm the race result remains unchanged.
The case reopens after Williams supplies new, relevant evidence, including 360-degree onboard from Sainz and rear-facing footage from Liam Lawson’s Racing Bulls. Both were unavailable during the Zandvoort weekend.
Reassembling the original Zandvoort panel delays the process by nearly two weeks. The hearing occurs before the Italian Grand Prix, following Williams’ formal right of review request.
Previously unseen 360-degree and rear-facing footage prompts the stewards to reopen the case.
Sainz acknowledges he is not fully entitled to outside space at Turn 1 under overtaking guidelines. He also cites Lawson’s mid-corner oversteer as the trigger for the contact.
Weighing the new material and driver statements, the stewards classify the clash as a racing incident. They find neither driver solely or predominantly at fault for the collision.
Two penalty points are removed from Sainz’s superlicence. The in-race 10-second penalty remains applied, leaving the finishing order and championship points tally unchanged.
Stewards remove Sainz’s two penalty points but retain the 10-second penalty.
The outcome underscores the threshold for a right of review: significant, new, and relevant evidence. Williams meets that bar through additional camera angles and driver testimony.
The process also reflects evolving use of technology in stewarding. Wider camera coverage and telemetry access increasingly shape outcomes and align with broader auto racing industry trends.
[purpose]Stewards deem the Sainz-Lawson clash a racing incident with no sole or primary blame.[/purpose]
For Sainz, removal of the points eases superlicence risk without altering his Zandvoort finishing position. Williams gains clarity on precedent as the season’s margin for error narrows.
The case mirrors recent instances where new data emerges post‑event and reframes responsibility. It underlines why teams pursue procedural avenues when additional evidence becomes available.
These judgments also inform competitors across different motorsport disciplines, where codified guidelines and consistency remain central to fair competition.
Reassembling the original Zandvoort panel delays the ruling by almost two weeks.
Visual Summary
-2⃣
Penalty Points
Removed
Removed
⏲️+10s
Race Penalty
Stands
Stands
Carlos Sainz keeps
his race penalty,
but loses his penalty points after Williams’ review.
his race penalty,
but loses his penalty points after Williams’ review.
360°
Rear Cam
⚖️
Stewards: Racing incident, both drivers partly involved.
⚡ Williams’ right of review used new camera angles and honest driver input. Stewards ruled for fairness—a pivotal precedent for every F1 team.
Daniel Miller reports on Formula 1 Grand Prix weekends with race-day analysis, team-radio highlights, and point-standings updates. He explains power-unit upgrades, aerodynamic developments, and driver rivalries in straightforward, SEO-friendly language for a global F1 audience.
